From the Israel Institute of NZ website…
As New Zealand approaches the 2026 general election, foreign policy will not determine most voters’ choices. But for New Zealanders concerned about Israel, antisemitism, terrorism and the direction of this country’s Middle East policy, there are meaningful differences between the political parties.
The Israel Institute of New Zealand (IINZ) asked political parties six questions intended to move beyond the familiar language of ceasefires, international law and support for a two-state solution. The questions addressed practical issues: New Zealand funding for organisations connected with terrorism or the promotion of violence; relations with Israel; rhetoric such as “from the river to the sea” and “globalise the intifada”; discriminatory campaigns against Israel; recognition of Palestinian statehood; and whether recognition in the aftermath of 7 October could reward terrorism and hostage-taking.
The responses are revealing. So, too, are the questions that were not answered.
New Zealand First and ACT provided direct answers to the questionnaire. National supplied a statement from its foreign affairs spokesperson, Todd McClay, rather than responding to the six questions individually. National MP Stuart Smith separately answered all six questions, but his responses are his own and should not be confused with official National Party policy.
Labour, the Green Party, and Te Pāti Māori were also approached. No response was received from them by the time of publication.
Read the full article on the Israel Institute of NZ website HERE.
